On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” aiming to end birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States. This policy change targets children born to parents who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents, effectively denying automatic citizenship to those born to undocumented immigrants and individuals on temporary visas.

Understanding Birthright Citizenship

Birthright citizenship, enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. The relevant portion of the amendment states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”

This principle has been a cornerstone of American immigration policy since its ratification in 1868.

Details of the Executive Order

President Trump’s executive order seeks to reinterpret the 14th Amendment by excluding children born to non-citizen and non-permanent resident parents from automatic citizenship. The order is scheduled to take effect on February 19, 2025, allowing a 30-day window from its signing.

Legal Challenges and Opposition

The executive order has prompted immediate legal challenges. Eighteen states, led by New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, have filed lawsuits arguing that the order is unconstitutional. They contend that the president lacks the authority to unilaterally alter constitutional rights, emphasizing that such a significant change requires a constitutional amendment.

Civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have also initiated legal actions against the order. They argue that the 14th Amendment’s language is clear and that any attempt to modify birthright citizenship through executive action is both unlawful and discriminatory.

Historical and Legal Precedents

The U.S. Supreme Court has previously upheld the principle of birthright citizenship. In the 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Court ruled that a child born in the United States to foreign parents is a U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment.

Legal experts widely view this precedent as affirming that any changes to birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order.

Implications and Next Steps

If implemented, the executive order could significantly impact millions of individuals born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, potentially rendering them stateless or subject to complex immigration proceedings. However, given the immediate legal challenges and the strong constitutional arguments against the order, its future remains uncertain.

As the situation develops, it is expected that the judiciary will play a crucial role in determining the order’s validity. Observers anticipate that the case may ultimately reach the Supreme Court. Setting the stage for a landmark decision on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and the scope of executive power.

What Do You Think?

• Do you believe birthright citizenship should be reconsidered in the U.S.?
• How do you think this executive order will impact families and communities?
• Should constitutional rights be subject to reinterpretation by executive orders?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below! Your voice matters in shaping this critical national conversation.

Follow MEFeater on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Pinterest for more news and updates.