In a recent livestream, hip-hop veteran Funkmaster Flex reignited controversy around the infamous 1999 Club New York shooting incident involving Diddy and rapper Shyne. Flex claimed that Shyne has been misleading the public about his role in the incident. He accused Shyne of fabricating details to paint himself as a scapegoat for Diddy. Flex argued that Shyne’s narrative—that he took the fall to protect Diddy from legal consequences—was far from the truth. Flex’s comments come years after the event, which drastically impacted both Shyne’s and Diddy’s careers.

Shyne’s Past Claims and Flex’s Response

Shyne, who served nearly a decade in prison on charges related to the shooting, has previously claimed he acted in defense of himself and others. Flex, however, argued that Shyne’s portrayal of the incident is embellished. He asserted that Shyne is manipulating his past to stay relevant. Flex even questioned Shyne’s credibility, saying, “If you were protecting Diddy, why didn’t you say that then.” Flex’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment that Shyne’s transformation and public narrative post-prison may be self-serving.

The case, which involved gunfire that injured three people in the crowded club, has long been a point of contention. At the time, Shyne was just breaking into the music scene and faced severe repercussions, while Diddy, one of the most powerful figures in hip-hop, was acquitted. Fans are now divided on Flex’s statements. Some support Shyne’s version of events, seeing him as someone who took responsibility to protect his mentor. Others agree with Flex’s view, suggesting Shyne may be crafting a “martyr” narrative for himself.

This latest dispute between Funkmaster Flex and Shyne taps into long-standing conversations about loyalty, power, and image in the music industry. Do you agree with Flex’s perspective? Or do you see Shyne as someone who simply accepted consequences that weren’t entirely his?

Follow MEFeater on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Pinterest for more music news and updates.